By Veeragathy Thanabalasingham
Colombo, January 30: Although the Jaffna district Member of Parliament Sivagnanam Shritharan had told the media on what principles he would lead the struggle for the political rights of the Tamil people after being elected as the leader of the Ilankai Thamizhasu Katchi (ITAK), it was expected that he would officially explain his policies after assuming office at the party’s convention that was to be held in Trincomalee last Sunday.
But the convention was postponed indefinitely due to controversies surrounding the selection of other posts, including the general secretary of the party. So the new leader was unable to deliver that important speech.
After the election of Shritharan by the party’s general council in a secret ballot at Trincomalee Town Hall on 21 January, the other contender, Member of Parliament for Jaffna district M.A. Sumanthiran had publicly announced that he would cooperate with the new leader.
However, the incidents that took place in Trincomalee last Saturday and the subsequent comments made by the stalwarts of the ITAK clearly indicate the challenges that Shritharan will have to face in leading the party as a cohesive entity.
While it is not known for sure when the convention will be held, criticisms are being made on the basis of the comments made by Shritharan to the media.
After the end of the civil war, Shritharan, who has been a resident of Wanni, heartland of the ethnic war, contested as a candidate of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA ) in Jaffna district at the general election in 2010, and entered parliamentary politics. He was an ardent supporter of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ealam (LTTE). He never hesitated to say it publicly. He has been a Member of Parliament for the last 14 years and has often expressed his views in support of the LTTE inside and outside Parliament.
Shritharan’s comments even after he was elected as the leader of the ITAK showed that he is intent on leading the party on a political path that followed the LTTE’s principles but not an armed struggle.
Based on the interview given by Sritharan to the Tamil Guardian newspaper, it seems that he is sure that the 13th Amendment to the Constitution is not going to be the solution to the problems of the Tamil people. He has said that any political solution found within the scope of a Unitary State will not satisfy the political aspirations of the Tamil people and that their journey is towards a solution based on a Federal System.
He told Tamil Guardian that the Tamils’ ideal is to find a solution in a merged North-Eastern Province that can recognize the land, language and cultural identities of the Tamils, and to help the Tamils in their Homeland in charting a political path for the liberation of the Eelam Tamils.
He said that it is very important to unite the Tamils in the Homeland and in the Tamil Diaspora and connect with the Tamils in Tamil Nadu in charting a political path.
Calling for the unity of the Tamil parties, he said that the Diaspora Tamil community has an important role in uniting the Tamil nationalist forces and charting a path for all. Above all, it is important to note that Shritharan has said that their journey should begin from the graves of the Eelam national liberation fighters.
There is no doubt that his views are aimed at appeasing his supporters, including radical groups within the Diaspora Tamil community.
But what took place was only an internal party election. No one knows what the Tamil people think about Shritharan’s stance.
About 15 years have passed since the end of the civil war, and in today’s domestic and international political situation, Shritharan, who has come to the leadership of a main political party of Sri Lankan Tamils, has the responsibility to understand the challenges that may lie ahead of him. He must realize the inadequacies of a political approach that binds the Tamil people to memories of past struggles. He should be freed from thinking that a political thought, which remembers and emphasizes past struggles and sacrifices, is the Tamil peoples’ view. It is his view.
Such a view may be a liability in the present context. The irrelevance and dangers of applying the political doctrines of a movement which believed only in armed struggle to parliamentary politics must be grasped.
And it is not an easy task to re-mobilize the Tamil people today of the North and East as the leaders of the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) of those days did using emotional slogans in the pre- Vaddukkoddai Resolution period.
The needs of the Tamil people and their thinking about the future have completely changed. Most of them are thinking of migrating to Western Europe of North America.
The more nationalist forces among the Southern Sri Lankan polity will definitely take advantage of Shritharan’s rise as the leader of the main political party of the Tamils and whip up communal propaganda that separatist forces are re- emerging in the North and East. There are already clear signs of that.
Fifteen years after the end of the civil war, the election of someone with a staunch Tamil nationalist stance like Shritharan as leader of the ITAK is a setback for the relatively moderate forces within the party in particular and Tamil polity in general.
However, the governments that came to power after the end of the war themselves are responsible for this unfortunate scenario.
Tamil political leaders who believe in solving the ethnic problem by cooperating with the government through constitutional processes should have been able to show some results to the Tamil people to justify their actions. The usual deceitful practices of governments are the main reason for the isolation of moderate political forces from the Tamils and the regaining of influence by radical nationalist forces.
It is against this backdrop that Shritharan’s victory and Sumanthiran’s defeat should be viewed in the election of the leader of the ITAK.
END
