• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisements
  • Contact
Saturday, February 23, 2019
No Result
View All Result
NewsIn.Asia
27 °c
Colombo
  • Top Story
  • Around South Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • China
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Myanmar
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • World
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Arts
  • Cinema
  • Music
  • Offbeat
  • Interviews
  • Top Story
  • Around South Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • China
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Myanmar
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • World
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Arts
  • Cinema
  • Music
  • Offbeat
  • Interviews
No Result
View All Result
NewsIn.Asia
No Result
View All Result
Home Around South Asia

How Britain stole $45 trillion from India and lied about it

by Editor
December 15, 2018
in Around South Asia, Around The World, India, Top Story
0 0
0
How Britain stole $45 trillion from India and lied about it
124
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Dr.Jason Hickel

London, December 15 (Al Jazeera): There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonization ofIndia– as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself. If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain. So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.

New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik –just publishedby Columbia University Press – deals a crushing blow to this narrative.

Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly$45trillionfrom India during the period 1765 to 1938.

It’s a staggering sum. For perspective, $45 trillion is17 times morethan the total annual gross domestic product of theUnited Kingdomtoday.

How did this come about?

It happened through the trade system. Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way – mostly with silver – as they did with any other country.

But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.

Here’s how it worked. The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third)to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use. In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them.

It was a scam – theft on a grand scale.

Dr.Utsa Patnaik

Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on because the agent who collected the taxes was not the same as the one who showed up to buy their goods. Had it been the same person, they surely would have smelled a rat.

Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere. The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain’s industrialization.

Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part on this systematic theft from India.

On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they “bought” them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.

After the British Raj took over in 1857, colonizers added a special new twist to the tax-and-buy system. As the East India Company’s monopoly broke down, Indian producers were allowed to export their goods directly to other countries. But Britain made sure that the payments for those goods nonetheless ended up in London.

How did this work? Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do so using special Council Bills – a unique paper currency issued only by the British Crown. And the only way to get those bills was to buy them from London with gold or silver. So traders would pay London in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers. When Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were “paid” in rupees out of tax revenues – money that had just been collected from them. So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they were defrauded.

Dr.Jason Hickel, Anthropologist London School of Economics

Meanwhile, London ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the Indians in exchange for their exports.

This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus with the rest of the world – a surplus that lasted for three decades in the early 20th century – it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts because the real income from India’s exports wasappropriatedin its entirety by Britain.

Some point to this fictional “deficit” as evidence that India was a liability to Britain. But exactly the opposite is true. Britain intercepted enormous quantities of income that rightly belonged to Indian producers. India was the goose that laid the golden egg. Meanwhile, the “deficit” meant that India had no option but to borrow from Britain to finance its imports. So the entire Indian population was forced into completely unnecessary debt to their colonial overlords, further cementing British control.

Britain used the windfall from this fraudulent system to fuel the engines of imperial violence – funding the invasion ofChinain the 1840s and the suppression of the Indian Rebellion in 1857. And this was on top of what the Crown took directly from Indian taxpayers to pay for its wars. As Patnaik points out, “the cost of all Britain’s wars of conquest outside Indian borders were charged always wholly or mainly to Indian revenues.”

And that’s not all. Britain used this flow of tribute from India to finance the expansion of capitalism in Europe and regions of European settlement, like Canada and Australia. So not only the industrialisation of Britain but also the industrialisation of much of the Western world was facilitated by extraction from the colonies.

Patnaik identifies four distinct economic periods in colonial India from 1765 to 1938, calculates the extraction for each, and then compounds at a modest rate of interest (about 5 percent, which is lower than the market rate) from the middle of each period to the present. Adding it all up, she finds that the total drain amounts to US$ 44.6 trillion. This figure is conservative, she says, and does not include the debts that Britain imposed on India during the Raj.

These are eye-watering sums. But the true costs of this drain cannot be calculated. If India had been able to invest its own tax revenues and foreign exchange earnings in development – asJapandid – there’s no telling how history might have turned out differently. India could very well have become an economic powerhouse. Centuries of poverty and suffering could have been prevented.

All of this is a sobering antidote to the rosy narrative promoted by certain powerful voices in Britain. The conservative historian Niall Ferguson has claimed that British rule helped “develop” India. While he was prime minister, David Cameron asserted that British rule was anet helpto India.

This narrative has found considerable traction in the popular imagination: according toa 2014 YouGov poll, 50 percent of people in Britain believe that colonialism was beneficial to the colonies.

Yet during the entire 200-year history of British rule in India, there was almostno increasein per capita income. In fact, during the last half of the 19th century – the heyday of British intervention – income in India collapsed by half. The average life expectancy of Indians dropped by a fifth from 1870 to 1920. Tens of millions died needlessly of policy-induced famine.

Britain didn’t develop India. Quite the contrary – as Patnaik’s work makes clear – India developed Britain.

What does this require of Britain today? An apology? Absolutely. Reparations? Perhaps – although there is not enough money in all of Britain to cover the sums that Patnaik identifies.

In the meantime, we can start by setting the story straight. We need to recognize that Britain retained control of India not out of benevolence but for the sake of plunder and that Britain’s industrial rise didn’t emerge sui generis from the steam engine and strong institutions, as our schoolbooks would have it, but depended on violent theft from other lands and other peoples.

(The featured picture the top shows Britain’s last Viceroy in India Lord Louis Mountbatten and Lady Edwina Mountbatten riding to the Viceregal Lodge in New Delhi on March 22, 1947)

 

Recommended

  • Recommend
US Special Envoy says Taliban has agreed to a “draft framework” for Afghan solution

US Special Envoy says Taliban has agreed to a “draft framework” for Afghan solution

4 weeks ago
Chinese company turns out “paper thin” steel for use in computers and aircraft

Chinese company turns out “paper thin” steel for use in computers and aircraft

1 month ago
Bangladesh High Commission and Lankan Ministry of Languages observe International Mother Language Day

Bangladesh High Commission and Lankan Ministry of Languages observe International Mother Language Day

2 days ago
A local approach ensures 44% of Android apps in India are Chinese

A local approach ensures 44% of Android apps in India are Chinese

2 months ago
Assam protests against new Indian citizenship law meant to facilitate immigration

Assam protests against new Indian citizenship law meant to facilitate immigration

2 months ago
Load More

Popular News

    About Us

    NewsIn.Asia is a South Asian website, operating from Colombo and accessed by readers worldwide. It offers its readers timely, indepth and comprehensive coverage of South Asian news, views and analyses.

    Follow US

    • Modi hugs Saudi Crown Prince on arrival expects huge investments in the energy sector - New Delhi February 19 Agencies New Indian Express In a special gesture Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday received at the airport here Saudi Arabia s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman signifying importance India attaches to the visit by the leader of the powerful Gulf nation The View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Pakistan PM neither condemned the Pulwama attack nor condoled the deaths India points out - Pakistan claims to be the greatest victim of terrorism This is far from the truth Pakistan is the nerve center of terrorism the Indian External Affairs Ministry said View more at NewsIn Asia
    • One pilot killed as two Indian aerobatic aircraft collide over Bengaluru - The defense ministry confirmed that two Hawk aircraft of the Surya Kiran Aerobatic Display Team had crashed near the Yelahanka Air Force Base View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Ex-Maldivian President Yameen in Maafushi prison in money laundering case - Male February 19 Avas Former Maldivian President Abdulla Yameen has been taken to Maafushi Prison in accordance with Criminal Court s orders to keep the former President in custody until the end of his money laundering trial Yameen appeared in the Criminal Court here on Monday View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Tamil Nadu parties AIADMK and PMK seal electoral pact Talks with BJP on - Chennai February 19 AIR After lengthy negotiations the Pattali Makkal Katchi PMK has signed an alliance with the ruling All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam AIADMK for the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections The pact was signed between PMK founder S Ramadoss and AIADMK coordinator and View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Pakistan PM warns of immediate retaliation if India becomes adventurous - We all know that it is easy to start a war but very difficult to end And we do not know where it all will lead to Premier Imran Khan said in a TV address View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Sri Lankan spices to enter new global markets in 2019 - Colombo Feb 19 Sri Lanka s lucrative spice industry is targeting a revenue of US 500 million dollars in 2019 following its entry into new global markets as well as increasing exports of pepper cloves and nutmeg local media reported Tuesday To achieve this target the spice View more at NewsIn Asia
    • Indian aerobatic jets collide and crash pilots eject - Bengaluru February 19 NDTV Two jets of the Indian Air Force s Suryakiran Aerobatic Team crashed in Bengaluru a day before the Aero India show begins in the city The accident took place during a rehearsal session ahead of the mega show The pilots of the two jets have ejected safely in View more at NewsIn Asia
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertisements
    • Contact

    © 2018-19 NewsIn.Asia - Lovingly Maintained by DigitalArc.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Top Story
    • Around South Asia
      • Afghanistan
      • Bangladesh
      • China
      • India
      • Maldives
      • Myanmar
      • Nepal
      • Pakistan
      • Sri Lanka
    • World
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Travel
    • Arts
    • Cinema
    • Music
    • Offbeat
    • Interviews

    © 2018-19 NewsIn.Asia - Lovingly Maintained by DigitalArc.

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password? Sign Up

    Fill the forms bellow to register

    All fields are required. Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In